• Analysts, Applications, News

    Posted on January 23rd, 2009

    Written by Yvan Cognasse

    Tags

    , ,
    Oracle vs. SAP: Where to Find Publicly Reports?

    AMR: “R/3 – mySAP migration cost analysis

    Project planner: Considering upgrading a core enterprise application system from client/server to a Web-based architecture? Find out the steps involved in upgrading to mySAP.

    Details on http://www.baselinemag.com/article2/0,1540,818275,00.asp

    Walker Information

    Walker Loyalty Reports provide the information needed to measure your company’s success. Loyalty reports offer critical benchmarking information-providing key comparisons and perspectives for companies in many industries-as well as loyalty-related issues. By helping your company understand how you compare to industry norms, these reports assist in developing mission-critical customer loyalty management programs to improve customer and employee loyalty, retention, and profitability.

    Details on http://www.walkerinfo.com/walker-loyalty-reports.asp

    Nucleus Research “SAP Customers Are 20 Percent less Profitable Than Their Peers

    An analysis of nearly 100 public companies listed on SAP’s Web site finds these SAP users are 20 percent less profitable than their peers. Despite SAP advertising claims to the contrary, factual analysis of ROE data shows the best run businesses don’t run SAP.

    Details on http://nucleusresearch.com/research/notes-and-reports/research-note-sap-customers-are-20-percent-less-profitable-than-their-peers/

    Nucleus Research “SAP and Oracle: Who’s Ready for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses?

    Who’s delivering the greatest value to the SMB market? An in-depth analysis of 56 customers showed significant differences between the value delivered to SMBs by Oracle and SAP today.

    Details on http://nucleusresearch.com/research/notes-and-reports/sap-and-oracle-whos-ready-for-small-and-medium-sized-businesses/

    Nucleus Research “The real ROI from SAP?“:

    Fifty-seven percent of SAP customers interviewed did not believe that they had achieved a positive ROI, after having used their SAP applications for an average of 2.8 years. Those who did achieve a positive ROI limited customization and project scope, and they focused on user adoption and repeatability

    Details on http://nucleusresearch.com/research/notes-and-reports/the-real-roi-from-sap/. More information from Nucleus Research on http://nucleusresearch.com/research/topic/enterprise-applications/.

    Current Analysis “Enterprise Applications Cost and Satisfaction Study

    Businesses invest considerable time and money in the research and acquisition of enterprise applications, and continue to invest in the implementation and support of those applications. Current Analysis recently conducted a study of Oracle and SAP customers to determine which vendor, if any, has lower acquisition, implementation, and maintenance costs. Based on results from extensive interviews with Oracle and SAP customers, Current Analysis determined that Oracle applications cost less to acquire, implement, and maintain than SAP. Overall nonrecurring acquisition and implementation costs measured for Oracle applications are $6.4M, 48% lower than those for SAP, and overall recurring maintenance costs for Oracle applications are $264K, 14% lower than SAP.

    Details on http://www.oracle.com/corporate/analystportal/insider/oracle_v_sap_enterprise_apps_cost_and_satisfaction.pdf

    This entry was posted on Friday, January 23rd, 2009 at 10:47 am and is filed under Analysts, Applications, News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
  • This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  • 0 Comments

    Take a look at some of the responses we've had to this article.

  • Post a Comment

    Let us know what you thought.

  • Name:

    Email (required):

    Website:

    Message: